Tag Archives: feb 14

Another biodesign success: Researchers develop low-cost medical ventilators for global disasters

FEB. 14, 2011 Steve Fisch

After learning that his hospital would be short ventilators in the event of an influenza pandemic, Matthew Callaghan sketched out concepts for a less expensive ventilator on a napkin at a lunchtime meeting with a fellow physician.

Matthew Callaghan, MD, had an epiphany about medical device design during a pandemic planning meeting, when his hospital was drafting a worst-case scenario protocol to decide which types of patients would receive life support from the hospital’s limited number of breathing ventilators.

 “the physicians assumed that we’d have to ration the ventilators, and that if we put the criteria on paper, we wouldn’t feel bad about the life-or-death decisions we were making,” said Callaghan. “all of a sudden, I realized that the task force wasn’t addressing the root problem. So I asked, ‘why not design a cheaper ventilator so rationing isn’t necessary?’”

So Callaghan started to think about why ventilators, which primarily move air in and out of impaired lungs, cost upwards of $40,000, and why no one had designed a low-end model that could be stockpiled for large-scale disasters.

Fortunately, the fact that he was a surgical resident at UC-San Francisco at the time wasn’t a mental barrier for Callaghan, who has degrees in product design and biology from Carnegie Mellon, a medical degree from State University of new York, a medical fellowship from new York University and now a postdoctoral position in Stanford University’s biodesign program. In addition, his kindergarten report card probably said, “He colors outside of the lines.”

He began by inviting a physician friend to lunch, and they began sketching some ideas on a napkin. after learning that the United States would be short about 700,000 ventilators during a moderate-to-severe influenza pandemic, they realized that they might be able to build a business around their ideas.

Three years later, Callaghan’s team is close to commercially launching a low-cost ventilator, called OneBreath, which will be the first device specifically designed to address the global shortage of emergency the OneBreath ventilator went from napkin sketch to finished product with the help of Stanford Biodesign, a training incubator in medical technology that brings together multidisciplinary teams of medical, engineering, law and business school students to address unmet medical needs with innovative approaches. this program, which was founded 10 years ago, has jump-started a number of successful innovations, including a new approach to minimally invasive spine surgery (Simpirica Spine); a more cost-effective way to diagnose heart rhythm abnormalities (iRhythm); and a device to accelerate healing of skin ulcers (Spiracur). Stanford Biodesign recently established joint programs in India and Singapore to specifically help accelerate medical solutions for underserved populations.

The Stanford Biodesign credo is that medical innovation can be taught, and all design teams learn a systematic approach to needs finding, invention and implementation. Before biodesign fellows even get close to building a prototype, they spend three months on clinical observation, asking questions, identifying needs, analyzing markets and brainstorming concepts. along the way, they also learn about managing intellectual property, the regulatory process and medical reimbursements, applying this knowledge to their specific projects.

Steve Fisch

From left: Larry Miller, Matthew Callaghan, William Bishop, Frederick Winston and Dhruv Boddupolli show an early prototype of the OneBreath ventilator that they have developed. their device, which is at least a year away from roll-out, is projected to be sold at a fraction of the cost of a typical hospital ventilator.

“We say that a well-characterized need is the DNA of a good invention. It’s a lot of work to get the need right, but once you are there, the invention will almost certainly follow,” said Paul Yock, MD, director of Stanford Biodesign.

With the help of this methodology, members of Callaghan’s team were able to focus their concepts to more effectively address a need device manufacturers missed — the pandemic/disaster ventilator market in developing nations. In these areas of explosive population growth, health-care infrastructure is limited, and the demand for low-cost ventilators is great, especially in China, where large influenza outbreaks are common.

“our team decided to design a ventilator that could operate in the middle of nowhere during emergencies, without all the bells and whistles — such as remote monitoring or neonatal care — that are not only hard to use, but are only needed for one in 1,000 patients,” said Callaghan.

Structurally, the OneBreath team lowered manufacturing costs by reducing the number of parts; airflow is measured and controlled with propriety software rather than hardware. to ensure operability and portability during earthquakes, floods, tsunamis and other disasters, the compact plastic housing is rugged, grime-resistant, stackable and easy to carry. to cope with power outages, units come with a seven-hour rechargeable battery. because expert technicians are few and far between during disasters, the units are simple enough for novices to operate and repair, and breathing tube replacement costs are 50 cents, rather than the $180 required with high-end ventilators.

With an out-the-door cost targeted at less than $800, OneBreath’s retail price should be a fraction of comparable ventilators, priced so that governments and institutions can afford to stockpile units for potential disasters.

Thomas Krummel, MD, chair of the Department of Surgery and a Stanford Biodesign co-director, is enthusiastic about the project: “I love the duality of the OneBreath solution, the way its affordability addresses the West’s need for pandemic preparedness, while at the same time addressing the developing world’s need for basic, inexpensive ventilators.” So far the product has been well-received; it was named a popular Science Invention of the Year in 2010 and has won awards from the American Association for Respiratory Care, the American College of Surgery Clinical Congress and NCIAA BMEidea.

Callaghan credits the Stanford entrepreneurial spirit, in part, for OneBreath’s success.

“When we needed a business plan, we visited the Stanford Graduate School of Business, and three students wrote our plan as part of a class assignment. after we built our first cardboard prototypes, we went over to Stanford’s pulmonary and critical care office with donuts and coffee, and the physicians were happy to provide user feedback.”

Before his biodesign fellowship, Callaghan had no idea how hard it was to get a medical device through the regulatory process: “I laugh when I look back at our early grant applications, where we estimated that it’d take $20,000 and seven months to get our device approved by the FDA.”

Thus far, the biodesign-led development process has taken two years, with the addition of a Wallace H. Coulter Foundation grant and award money from a number of design competitions. Biodesign is supported from a variety of internal and external sources, including pilot and fellowship grants from Spectrum, the organization that oversees Stanford’s NIH-funded Clinical and Translational Science Award. Callaghan estimates it’ll take at least another year and $2.5 million to usher OneBreath through final testing, agency approvals, pilot manufacturing and lockdown of technical documentation. if the device is successfully launched, all the intellectual property holders — the OneBreath inventors, the investors and Stanford — share in any future profits.

While they’re waiting for agency approvals in the United States and Europe, they’ll field test pilot units in China and India. By documenting their successes overseas, they hope to convince U.S. institutional buyers, who often perceive lower-priced medical devices as less effective or risky, to give their ventilators a try.

Callaghan is now going through the bittersweet process of transitioning his recently incorporated company to a new CEO, Bryan Loomas, who has 27 years in the medical device business; and a VP of business development, Frederick Winston, who graduated from the Stanford Graduate School of Business. Stephen Ruoss, MD, associate professor of pulmonary and critical care medicine is Callaghan’s technical advisor.

Looking forward, Callaghan has several new medical ideas that he’s eager to develop. His advice to others with similar aspirations: “Assemble a small team of quality people — engineers, physicians, MBAs — who are all willing to wear multiple hats. In a start-up, everyone needs to do everything, from spell-checking brochures to taking out the trash.” 

Kris Newby is the communications manager for Spectrum, the Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Education and Research.  

Stanford University Medical Center integrates research, medical education and patient care at its three institutions – Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital & Clinics and Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital. For more information, please visit the Office of Communication & Public Affairs site at http://mednews.stanford.edu/.

Another biodesign success: Researchers develop low-cost medical ventilators for global disasters

IT News Online > – – Dynatronics Announces Fiscal Second Quarter Results

Dynatronics Announces Fiscal Second Quarter Results Copyright 2011 PR Newswire. All Rights Reserved2011-02-14

SALT LAKE CITY, Feb. 14, 2011 /PRNewswire/ — Dynatronics Corporation (Nasdaq:DYNT) today announced results for its fiscal second quarter ended December 31,2010. Sales for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, were $8,199,347, compared to$8,501,437 for the quarter ended December 31, 2009. Sales for the six monthsended December 31, 2010, were $16,118,635, compared to $16,783,900 for thesimilar period of the prior year. Net income for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, was $67,839 ($.01 per commonshare), compared to $188,299 ($.01 per common share) for the same quarter in theprior fiscal year. Net income for the six months ended December 31, 2010, was$84,851 ($.01 per common share), compared to $256,923 ($.02 per common share)for the same period in the prior fiscal year. “Higher R&D expenses of $149,637 for the quarter and $283,465 for the six monthperiod were a primary reason for reporting lower profits this year over lastyear. In addition, slower demand for capital equipment due to lingeringrecessionary pressures also contributed,” stated Kelvyn H. Cullimore Jr.,chairman and president of Dynatronics. “However, our R&D pipeline is as strongas ever with several new products under development. new products have alwaysbeen the lifeblood of our business.” the company recently announced the signing of major contracts with two grouppurchasing organizations (“GPOs”): Premier and Amerinet. Together, these GPOsrepresent tens of thousands of clinics and hospitals around the nation, spendingan estimated $50 million on physical medicine products annually. “We believe these landmark agreements will be a game-changer for Dynatronics,”said Larry K. Beardall, executive vice-president of sales and marketing.”Obtaining contracts with GPOs is something we have been working on for nearlythree years. While it will take time to convert the vast number of clinics toour brand of products, we are already receiving requests for product quotes fromGPO customers.” “As we begin to solicit sales orders under these GPO arrangements, we aregearing up our production capacity for a new level of operations,” addedCullimore. “With over 12,000 products now available through our catalog ande-commerce website, we are in a good position to supply this high-volume segmentof the physical medicine market.” Dynatronics has scheduled a conference call for investors on Monday, February14, 2011, at 1:30 p.m. ET. Those wishing to participate should call (800)926-7431 and use access code: 5687000. following is a summary of the financial results as of December 31, 2010, andJune 30, 2010, and for the three and six month periods then ended: Summary Selected Financial Data Statement of Income Highlights (Unaudited) three Months Ended December 31, 2010 2009 —- —- Net sales $8,199,347 $8,501,437 Cost of sales 5,029,906 5,174,060 ——— ——— gross profit 3,169,441 3,327,377 SG&A expenses 2,634,278 2,699,357 R&D expenses 356,519 206,882 Other expenses, net 65,604 110,936 —— ——- Net income before income taxes 113,040 310,202 Income tax provision (45,201) (121,903) ——- ——– Net income $67,839 $188,299 ======= ======== Diluted income per common share $0.01 $0.01 ===== ===== Six Months Ended December 31, 2010 2009 —- —- Net sales $16,118,635 $16,783,900 Cost of sales 9,997,361 10,277,181 ——— ———- gross profit 6,121,274 6,506,719 SG&A expenses 5,134,795 5,411,726 R&D expenses 706,315 422,850 Other expenses, net 137,387 220,167 ——- ——- Net income before income taxes 142,777 451,976 Income tax provision (57,926) (195,053) ——- ——– Net income $84,851 $256,923 ======= ——– Diluted income per common share $0.01 $0.02 ===== ===== Balance Sheet Highlights December 31, June 30, 2010 2010 —- —- (Unaudited) Cash $191,822 $383,756 Accounts receivable 3,866,503 3,735,251 Inventories 5,782,367 5,766,800 Total current assets 10,582,101 10,609,813 Total assets $14,877,942 $15,090,329 Accounts payable 1,921,433 $1,404,022 Accrued expenses 467,139 462,641 Line of credit 2,401,905 2,768,492 Total current liabilities 5,628,132 5,686,280 Total liabilities 8,069,737 8,291,052 Total liabilities and equity $14,877,942 $15,090,329 Dynatronics manufactures, markets and distributes advanced-technology medicaldevices, orthopedic soft goods and supplies, treatment tables and rehabilitationequipment for the physical therapy, sports medicine, chiropractic, podiatry,plastic surgery, dermatology and other related medical, cosmetic and aestheticmarkets. More information regarding Dynatronics is available atwww.dynatronics.com. This press release contains forward-looking statements. Those statements includereferences to the company’s expectations and similar statements such as thestatement regarding expectations for future new product line introductions andgrowth from GPO contracts. Actual results may vary from the views expressed inthe forward-looking statements contained in this release. the development andsale of the company’s products are subject to a number of risks anduncertainties, including, but not limited to, changes in the regulatoryenvironment, competitive factors, inventory risks due to shifts in marketdemand, market demand for the company’s products, availability of financing atcost effective rates, and the risk factors listed from time to time in thecompany’s SEC reports including, but not limited to, the report on Form 10-K forthe year ended June 30, 2010. SOURCE Dynatronics Corporation

<a href="http://www.itnewsonline.com/showprnstory.php?storyid=143821tag:news.google.com,2005:cluster=http://www.itnewsonline.com/showprnstory.php?storyid=143821Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:16:48 GMT 00:00″>IT News Online > – – Dynatronics Announces Fiscal Second Quarter Results

‘Bridalplasty’ appearance nets Crestwood woman a dream wedding – The SouthtownStar

‘Bridalplasty’ appearance nets Crestwood woman a dream wedding

By Victoria Johnson Correspondent Feb 14, 2011 04:21PM

Story Image

John, Mason, 3, and Allyson McAuliffe pose for a photo with some of their wedding memorabilia from Allyson’s time on the E! Channel’s show “Bridalplasty” at their home in Crestwood, Ill., on Friday, Feb. 11, 2011. | Joseph P. Meier~Sun-Times Media

Article Extras

Allyson Donovan and John McAuliffe had planned two weddings — and then realized both times they couldn’t afford what they’d planned.

Then the invitation to a casting call for a new E! channel reality show popped up in Donovan’s inbox. “Bridalplasty” was going to feature 12 brides-to-be competing for their dream wedding and for cosmetic surgeries on their “wish list.”

The Crestwood mom couldn’t resist.

“I am a very, very tough competitor, and I hate to lose,” Donovan said, “so I thought, ‘This might work for me.’ ”

Those who saw the finale air Jan. 30 know the outcome: Donovan won the top prize, a $100,000 December wedding at a Tuscan villa in Southern California. along the way, she also won several cosmetic surgeries and a total smile makeover.

Donovan said that although she previously had considered plastic surgery, even consulting a surgeon to remove arm fat, she was more interested in the dream wedding. So after going through a grueling application and tryout process, the fiery blonde set off for Los Angeles to tape the show.

She had promised her nervous fiancé from the start that she wouldn’t do anything too drastic.

“He didn’t want to marry a Heidi Montag,” Donovan said, referring to a reality star who famously had 10 plastic surgeries performed in one day.

At first, Donovan was intimidated by the 11 women she would live with for five weeks. The 33-year-old also worried about her chances, as she was the oldest competitor. But in the end, her no-nonsense competitiveness and self-deprecating sense of humor helped propel her to the top.

Donovan ended up undergoing five procedures: liposuction on her arms, chin and flanks (love handles), a breast lift and a total smile makeover. She opted to exchange about half the surgeries on her wish list — a tummy tuck, breast reduction and several other liposuction procedures — for 12 weeks with a personal trainer. She worked out three to six hours a day, losing 35 pounds.

Donovan also opted out of an eyebrow lift and skin-resurfacing because she found skin products used on the show gave her the desired effect. She has type I diabetes and decided undergoing so many procedures would be a medical risk.

Donovan said the recovery from the breast lift was the worst. Performed after filming ended, it kept her out of the gym for two weeks. After liposuction procedures, she said she felt ready for action the same day, with the other women in the house telling her to take it easy.

“My doctor actually said I was a freak of nature because I actually healed better than anyone on the show, and I was the type I diabetic,” she said.

Donovan saw little of her fiancé through the filming in August and September, and then had to stay in hiding, even away from him, friends and family, until her Dec. 10 wedding. The show did fly the couple’s 3-year-old son, Mason, out to spend some time with her, but McAuliffe was kept mostly in the dark about Donovan’s experiences. he continued to fret about the possibility that Donovan was undergoing drastic plastic surgeries.

“I told him, ‘You’ve got to stop reading stuff on the Internet and freaking out, and I’m promising you, I’m not doing these things!’ ” Donovan said.

In the end, it was Donovan who would get a big surprise. McAuliffe made a change of his own, shedding 28 pounds before the wedding.

“I couldn’t believe it. He’d lost so much weight! I mean, I was in shock,” she said.

E! flew 100 of the couple’s friends and family members out to attend the wedding, and the ceremony was a smash.

The entire experience provided something of a reprieve for the couple, both of whom have been out of work for more than a year. Donovan was a marketer and graphic designer, and McAuliffe was a cement mason.

Now that it’s over, Donovan is looking forward to getting back to a job search. Though E! helped out with the family’s bills, Donovan was restricted from working after returning to Crestwood in late December until the last show aired Jan. 30.

Though she’s back to the real reality of life back home — she spent last week dealing with a broken hot water tank and furnace in sub-freezing temperatures — she said her experience on “Bridalplasty” made her better equipped to cope with what life throws at her.

“At least I know I can handle it now,” she said. “I’m more positive.”

‘Bridalplasty’ appearance nets Crestwood woman a dream wedding – The SouthtownStar