Tag Archives: lunchtime

Facial Rejuvenation in an Hour or Less: Fact or Myth?

There are many advertisements and enticements these days in the media and internet touting the latest and greatest cosmetic surgery procedures.Many of these claim fabulous results without pain and no downtime.One such example of the many procedures I have seen is the so-called ‘lunchtime lift’, in which patients are reportedly able to come in during a lunch break, have a minimally invasive procedure performed in less than an hour, and go back to work with no scars or pain and with results comparable to a complete facelift.Having completed a fully accredited Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Fellowship training, I can report that such extravagant claims are sadly a myth.Numerous variants of these minimally-invasive facelift procedures have been described, whether with limited tissue undermining, skin excision, or with the use of surgical threads to ‘lift’ the face, but most of these techniques have been shown to be ineffective and with limited, temporary results at best.Many of these false campaigns are advertised unfortunately by self-reported cosmetic surgeons with little or no plastic surgery training of any kind.The above-mentioned ‘lunchtime lift’ was advertised by a family practice doctor where I completed my training.As always, I am a big proponent of seeking consultation with a fully-trained Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon affiliated with the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

One area of facial rejuvenation that has really exploded in the past few years that can have significant, immediate tangible effects in less than an hour are the injectable agents.although as a plastic surgeon, I greatly enjoy operating to create aesthetic rejuvenation for my patients, the advent of these injectable agents over the past decade has truly revolutionalized and filled (pun intended!) a niche in the cosmetically-minded consumer market.The patient population that it really appeals to that I personally have seen grow significantly in my private practice in Newport Beach, CA is the mid-thirties to late fifties population who are beginning to see the ravaging effects of aging, sagging facial skin that is exacerbated by the beautiful sunny weather here in southern California.these patients are starting to see wrinkles and creases form in the forehead, glabella (mid-brow), crow’s feet area, cheek folds, and the marionette lines of the lower mouth.although these early signs of aging progressively give patients a tired appearance, they are not quite candidates yet for a full facelift or other surgical procedure.I have noticed many patients in lovely Orange County, especially women, are vibrant, vital individuals who are very proactive in looking and feeling as good as they can.

Enter the injectable agents, which for all intents and purposes are remarkable in that they can be injected in the office in less than an hour with virtually no downtime, negligible pain, and a minimal complication rate.too good to be true?I thought so initially when I was first exposed to these products during my Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery training.however, having been injecting for several years now, I have been continually impressed with the results I am able to achieve for my patients with a very high satisfaction rate.Ultimately, a thorough discussion of the concerns and goals of each patient are essential for an excellent outcome.To the patient and public, the large variety of products available can become overwhelming and confusing; a consultation with your plastic surgeon should elucidate which products can be best for you.

As a brief overview, the injectables can be broadly grouped into the neurotoxin category and the soft tissue fillers category.these products do completely different things that target specific problem areas of the face which is important to understand.The neurotoxins, including the well-known Botox and the newer competitor Dysport, are both purified derivatives of Botulinum toxin type A that aim to paralyze hyperactive muscles of the face that lead to the wrinkles and creases that form with aging.Common areas to inject are the glabella to prevent the “number 11” sign between the brows, the crow’s feet area of the outer eyelid creases, and forehead furrows.The paralysis can require up to a week to take full effect, and results typically last for around 3 months.The art of injecting comes with experience with the key being to provide a softened, rejuvenated look without the unaesthetic stigmata of a ‘frozen’ face.although some practitioners prefer to base their pricing on the number of locations, I think that it is always a good idea to ask exactly how many units are used in each area and base the price per unit to keep it fair, as different dilution methods can be used by various practitioners and the number of units of toxin injected are not always consistent.

The other category of injectable agents is the soft tissue fillers.The most commonly used of these include Juvederm and Restylane which are both hyaluronic acids, Radiesse which is a calcium hydroxyapetite gel, and Sculptra, which is poly-L-lactic acid.There are also other fillers that are not used as often anymore, including Zyderm and Zyplast, which are bovine collagens that require skin testing to rule out allergies before administration, and silicone injections that are not available here in the United States.with time we frequently lose soft tissue fullness from gradual laxity and sagging of our facial skin, giving an aged and weary look.Each variant of filler has a different density and viscosity with its particular range of indications, but they are mainly used to restore lost volume in the face and help smooth out deep creases or wrinkles for aesthetic rejuvenation.Common areas to inject are the tear trough creases (nasojugal folds), depressions around the upper mouth (nasolabial folds) and lower mouth (marionette lines), augmenting the cheek bonesand creating fuller, more voluptuous lips.Temporal hollowing or depressed cheek volume can also be restored with the aid of these fillers.The results are immediate and can last 6-9 months, with some effects frequently seen over a year.

Although cosmetic surgery has taken a hit in the past few years, the growth of injectable agents has really taken off in this downturned economy.Experience from prior recessions has typically shown growth in the ‘immediate gratification’ market – items such as lipstick, chocolate and alcohol sales, that can provide a quick boost and pick-me-up to elevate consumer spirits.The injectables are no exception.with the ease of office treatment, minimal pain and downtime, and instant tangible results, treated patients are among the happiest of all cosmetic patients.If you are interested in learning more about these effective facial rejuvenation products, I encourage you to contact my office to further discuss which options may be right for you.although it seems that everyone and anyone these days is injecting to make a profit, these product injections are real procedures with possible risks and complications requiring a thorough knowledge of the facial anatomy, and I encourage each of you to explore and evaluate the credentials and training background for every physician you encounter.your choice of a well-educated and experienced plastic surgeon is critical in achieving an outstanding outcome.You deserve a treat, so give us a call today!

Parviz H. Goshtasby MD

Newport Plastic Surgery, Inc.

www.newportplasticsurgery.com

source link:NEWPORT PLASTIC SURGERYFacial Rejuvenation in an Hour or Less: Fact or Myth?Plastic Surgery Plastic Surgeon Facial Rejuvenation in an Hour or Less: Fact or Myth?

Facial Rejuvenation in an Hour or Less: Fact or Myth?

New Cosmetic Technologies Staten Island New York

For Immediate ReleaseAllure Plastic Surgery150 East 61stNew York, NY 10065212-661-2563
http://drelliotheller.comehellermdpr@gmail.com

(New York, NY) May 18, 2012- New cosmetic procedure technologies have caused cosmetic surgeries to increasingly become less invasive with quick recovery.  Elliot Heller M.D., and Andrew Miller, M.D., cosmetic surgery experts at Allure Plastic Surgery Staten Island & new York, have been at the forefront of cosmetic technologies offering quick lunchtime procedures to patients in the Manhattan, Staten Island and new Jersey areas.

There has been tremendous advancement in the utilization of lasers, fillers and other injectables (like Botox), that most cosmetic surgery procedures have little or no downtime.  Is the buzz as good as it seems?  After all 50% of consumers said they would consider cosmetic procedures, however, only 20 % ever get them done.  Dr. Heller and Dr. Miller say that there will be a constant increase in the demand for no downtime minimally invasive cosmetic procedures through out the next few years. “Plastic surgery procedures that at one time required invasive surgical treatments and long recovery times are now replaced by tiny incisions (or injections) and local anesthesia,” Said Dr. Heller.

At Allure Plastic Surgery Staten Island & new York they have seen an increase in patients contacting them for these time of lunchtime procedures. “there are many  new technologies on the market today, and thanks to speedy recovery times people are more then willing to try a less invasive procedure to address their face, skin or body image concerns.  In Staten Island and Manhattan we commonly perform  facelifts today using the Thread Lift, Ribbon Lift,  and Fraxel laser all of which tighten the skin with little or no incisions,” Dr. Miller says.  ”and last year we started using smart liposuction techniques with tumescent liposuction. Laser lipolysis (lipo) is now performed using small (3mm) cannulas that barely leave any visible scar and a tiny laser. We melt the excess fat and vacuum those fatty deposits away with Smart Liposuction techniques.  Our Staten Island & Manhattan patients benefit greatly because these new liposuction techniques tighten the skin, which helps with the sagging, but most of all most patients are back to work in two days,” said Dr. Heller.

Although the technology has opened up the possibilities for thousands of Manhattan and Staten Island men and women to get that nip and tuck they desire, it is important to note that “there still is a place for plastic surgery procedures.  What we tell Staten Island & new York City cosmetic surgery patients when offering many of these procedures is that the results can be dramatic, but not as long lasting as a plastic surgery procedure. however, because their is less downtime and quick recovery, this is what patients desire. It really depends on the patient, their skin, age, health . . .  and thats’s why the consultation is so important.  Each patient is different,” Said Dr. Heller. “The combination of Fraxel laser skin tightening and Botox, Restylane and Raidiesse we can rejuvenate the face and basically provide a facial rejuvenation with out surgery, however this process does take several visits.”

Allure Plastic Surgery Staten Island and new York offers a wide array of surgical & non-surgical plastic surgery procedures for men and women.  For more information and for a complimentary, no obligation, cosmetic surgery consultation please visit Staten Island Plastic Surgery or New York Plastic Surgery or call 1-212-661-2563 24 hours a day.

New Cosmetic Technologies Staten Island New York

Getting Rid of That Turkey Neck With Plastic Surgery

As the face ages, so does the neck. For some, the neck is often one of the biggest areas of facial aging concern particularly as one gets older. the loss of the once smooth jaw line and a more well-defined neck angle are telltale signs of the effects of gravity and time. by definition, the use of the term ‘turkey neck’, which almost everyone knows what that means (as unflattering as it is), means an older neck problem as it implies a lot of loose hanging skin. this is usually seen in the 50+ age range and much more common in the 60s and 70s.

When the loose skin in the neck area makes up the biggest part of the problem, the options for treatment become surgical and need to be more aggressive to get a satisfactory result. Forget about non-invasive options or ‘lunchtime’ type procedures. these simply will not work no matter how they are marketed. if the neck and jowl problem is mainly fat, as often occurs in the younger patient, then fat removal methods alone will be successful. Whether it is non-surgical lipodissolve or surgical liposuction, good results can be had as the skin has the ability to shrink and tighten up. when the skin is loose and floppy, that is a sign that it has lost any ability to contract and fat removal methods alone with only be met with disappointing results.

With considerable excess neck skin, variations of a facelift procedure are what is needed. using the term facelift for many patients is confusing as this procedure often conjures up images of extensive facial surgery throughout the whole face. in reality, a facelift only effects the neck and jowl area and will do nothing for the face above the jaw line. it is a poorly named procedure and a facelift should be called a neck-jowl lift. it is really less extensive and easier to go through than most patients actually think. there are many facelift names and procedures today but most of them are just variations on marketing and advertising.

In actuality, there are only two types of facelifts, limited and full. Which one is best for any patient is determined by the amount of loose neck skin that is present. if the loose neck skin is not extensive, a limited facelift may be enough as this lifts the loose jowl skin a lot and the loose neck skin a little. if there is a lot of loose neck skin, then a full facelift is really needed. this is the most powerful neck procedure and can produce some really dramatic results. the differences between the two are how much of an incision is needed around the ear and the number of days of recovery needed. (even though the recovery is really about how you look or a social issue, there is next to pain at all for either. to put a number to that difference, 4 (limited) vs. 8 (full) and 5 days (limited) vs. 7 to 10 days (full).

Getting Rid of That Turkey Neck With Plastic Surgery

Look Younger Without Surgery – ArkLaTexHomePage.com

Fighting the hands of time used to require going under the knife, but today, most in-demand anti-aging procedures are non-surgical.

They can all be done at lunchtime in a doctor’s office.

The most popular way to soften wrinkles is Botox and plastic surgeon Gary Price has been injecting Botox into the brows of women and men for years.

“Botox is a very safe and effective way of stopping muscles in the face from making wrinkles that we don’t like, and it can be used very selectively to take those wrinkles away” Price said.

Most patients want to soften the lines that form between the eyebrows and some also like it injected into the “crow’s feet” wrinkles around the eyes that are deeper when people smile.

Botox costs around $450 per area and typically lasts about four months.

An injection called Dysport is newer on the anti-aging scene and is similar to Botox in price and results.

Dr. Iacob Marcovici, the medical director of the Aesthetic Medical Center in Avon, like many doctors, has seen an increase in non-surgical outpatient procedures that allow women and men to return to work afterward.

“They can do it during their lunch. then they can put their makeup and sunscreen on and go about their business and nobody knows they had a procedure” Marcovici said.

The second most requested procedure is fillers, a hyaluronic acid under the brand names like Juvederm, Perlane and Restylane.

They are a gel-like substance injected into the face to fill in or “puff up” deeper wrinkles.

The doctors said patients request that fillers are injected into are the nasolabial folds — the lines from the bottom of the nose to the outer corner of the mouth. Fillers can last up to six months and cost around $575.

Another filler, called Sculptra, is fairly new, lasts longer and plumps up the cheek area.

Years ago, pulling the skin back was all that could be done, Dr. Price said, while filling in the cheeks is now used to achieve a more youthful face.

“This is an area of the face that we really can’t lift surgically and the reason that lifts don’t work is that the problem isn’t sagging in the first place. It’s the loss of volume” Dr. Price said.

Donna Calabrese, of Killingworth, recently had Sculptra injected into her cheek area, which had become flatter over the years.

“When I’ve looked at the old photographs of myself I’ve noticed I’ve lost a lot of volume in my face, which was making the sagging seem more pronounced,” she said.

Sculptra can be injected in about 20 minutes in a doctor’s office.

It can last two years or more and costs around $2,000, Price said.

Lasers and chemical peels round out the most desired non-surgical procedures to fight the signs of aging, according to the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

“Chemical peels are underrated in some ways. They are extremely effective and people don’t use them as much as they should. It’s less invasive, quick results, no downtime and the results are astonishing,” Dr. Marcovici said.

For one kind of peel, he uses a professional grade of fruit acid, which gives a rapid exfoliation of the dead skin cells and makes pores appear smaller, he said.

A series of five peels can run about $600.

Lasers can also decrease wrinkles and tighten skin, Price said.

Prices range from a few hundred dollars to a few thousand, depending on the type of treatment.

Avoiding wrinkles is not possible, no matter how good your genes are, but there is a major step you can take to slow the aging process on your skin, Dr. Marcovici said — avoid too much sun exposure.

He recommends daily use of a sunscreen with an SPF of 30 that blocks both UVA and UVB rays.

<a href="http://arklatexhomepage.com/fulltext/?nxd_id=165106tag:news.google.com,2005:cluster=http://arklatexhomepage.com/fulltext/?nxd_id=165106Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:41:49 GMT 00:00″>Look Younger Without Surgery – ArkLaTexHomePage.com

Another biodesign success: Researchers develop low-cost medical ventilators for global disasters

FEB. 14, 2011 Steve Fisch

After learning that his hospital would be short ventilators in the event of an influenza pandemic, Matthew Callaghan sketched out concepts for a less expensive ventilator on a napkin at a lunchtime meeting with a fellow physician.

Matthew Callaghan, MD, had an epiphany about medical device design during a pandemic planning meeting, when his hospital was drafting a worst-case scenario protocol to decide which types of patients would receive life support from the hospital’s limited number of breathing ventilators.

 “the physicians assumed that we’d have to ration the ventilators, and that if we put the criteria on paper, we wouldn’t feel bad about the life-or-death decisions we were making,” said Callaghan. “all of a sudden, I realized that the task force wasn’t addressing the root problem. So I asked, ‘why not design a cheaper ventilator so rationing isn’t necessary?’”

So Callaghan started to think about why ventilators, which primarily move air in and out of impaired lungs, cost upwards of $40,000, and why no one had designed a low-end model that could be stockpiled for large-scale disasters.

Fortunately, the fact that he was a surgical resident at UC-San Francisco at the time wasn’t a mental barrier for Callaghan, who has degrees in product design and biology from Carnegie Mellon, a medical degree from State University of new York, a medical fellowship from new York University and now a postdoctoral position in Stanford University’s biodesign program. In addition, his kindergarten report card probably said, “He colors outside of the lines.”

He began by inviting a physician friend to lunch, and they began sketching some ideas on a napkin. after learning that the United States would be short about 700,000 ventilators during a moderate-to-severe influenza pandemic, they realized that they might be able to build a business around their ideas.

Three years later, Callaghan’s team is close to commercially launching a low-cost ventilator, called OneBreath, which will be the first device specifically designed to address the global shortage of emergency the OneBreath ventilator went from napkin sketch to finished product with the help of Stanford Biodesign, a training incubator in medical technology that brings together multidisciplinary teams of medical, engineering, law and business school students to address unmet medical needs with innovative approaches. this program, which was founded 10 years ago, has jump-started a number of successful innovations, including a new approach to minimally invasive spine surgery (Simpirica Spine); a more cost-effective way to diagnose heart rhythm abnormalities (iRhythm); and a device to accelerate healing of skin ulcers (Spiracur). Stanford Biodesign recently established joint programs in India and Singapore to specifically help accelerate medical solutions for underserved populations.

The Stanford Biodesign credo is that medical innovation can be taught, and all design teams learn a systematic approach to needs finding, invention and implementation. Before biodesign fellows even get close to building a prototype, they spend three months on clinical observation, asking questions, identifying needs, analyzing markets and brainstorming concepts. along the way, they also learn about managing intellectual property, the regulatory process and medical reimbursements, applying this knowledge to their specific projects.

Steve Fisch

From left: Larry Miller, Matthew Callaghan, William Bishop, Frederick Winston and Dhruv Boddupolli show an early prototype of the OneBreath ventilator that they have developed. their device, which is at least a year away from roll-out, is projected to be sold at a fraction of the cost of a typical hospital ventilator.

“We say that a well-characterized need is the DNA of a good invention. It’s a lot of work to get the need right, but once you are there, the invention will almost certainly follow,” said Paul Yock, MD, director of Stanford Biodesign.

With the help of this methodology, members of Callaghan’s team were able to focus their concepts to more effectively address a need device manufacturers missed — the pandemic/disaster ventilator market in developing nations. In these areas of explosive population growth, health-care infrastructure is limited, and the demand for low-cost ventilators is great, especially in China, where large influenza outbreaks are common.

“our team decided to design a ventilator that could operate in the middle of nowhere during emergencies, without all the bells and whistles — such as remote monitoring or neonatal care — that are not only hard to use, but are only needed for one in 1,000 patients,” said Callaghan.

Structurally, the OneBreath team lowered manufacturing costs by reducing the number of parts; airflow is measured and controlled with propriety software rather than hardware. to ensure operability and portability during earthquakes, floods, tsunamis and other disasters, the compact plastic housing is rugged, grime-resistant, stackable and easy to carry. to cope with power outages, units come with a seven-hour rechargeable battery. because expert technicians are few and far between during disasters, the units are simple enough for novices to operate and repair, and breathing tube replacement costs are 50 cents, rather than the $180 required with high-end ventilators.

With an out-the-door cost targeted at less than $800, OneBreath’s retail price should be a fraction of comparable ventilators, priced so that governments and institutions can afford to stockpile units for potential disasters.

Thomas Krummel, MD, chair of the Department of Surgery and a Stanford Biodesign co-director, is enthusiastic about the project: “I love the duality of the OneBreath solution, the way its affordability addresses the West’s need for pandemic preparedness, while at the same time addressing the developing world’s need for basic, inexpensive ventilators.” So far the product has been well-received; it was named a popular Science Invention of the Year in 2010 and has won awards from the American Association for Respiratory Care, the American College of Surgery Clinical Congress and NCIAA BMEidea.

Callaghan credits the Stanford entrepreneurial spirit, in part, for OneBreath’s success.

“When we needed a business plan, we visited the Stanford Graduate School of Business, and three students wrote our plan as part of a class assignment. after we built our first cardboard prototypes, we went over to Stanford’s pulmonary and critical care office with donuts and coffee, and the physicians were happy to provide user feedback.”

Before his biodesign fellowship, Callaghan had no idea how hard it was to get a medical device through the regulatory process: “I laugh when I look back at our early grant applications, where we estimated that it’d take $20,000 and seven months to get our device approved by the FDA.”

Thus far, the biodesign-led development process has taken two years, with the addition of a Wallace H. Coulter Foundation grant and award money from a number of design competitions. Biodesign is supported from a variety of internal and external sources, including pilot and fellowship grants from Spectrum, the organization that oversees Stanford’s NIH-funded Clinical and Translational Science Award. Callaghan estimates it’ll take at least another year and $2.5 million to usher OneBreath through final testing, agency approvals, pilot manufacturing and lockdown of technical documentation. if the device is successfully launched, all the intellectual property holders — the OneBreath inventors, the investors and Stanford — share in any future profits.

While they’re waiting for agency approvals in the United States and Europe, they’ll field test pilot units in China and India. By documenting their successes overseas, they hope to convince U.S. institutional buyers, who often perceive lower-priced medical devices as less effective or risky, to give their ventilators a try.

Callaghan is now going through the bittersweet process of transitioning his recently incorporated company to a new CEO, Bryan Loomas, who has 27 years in the medical device business; and a VP of business development, Frederick Winston, who graduated from the Stanford Graduate School of Business. Stephen Ruoss, MD, associate professor of pulmonary and critical care medicine is Callaghan’s technical advisor.

Looking forward, Callaghan has several new medical ideas that he’s eager to develop. His advice to others with similar aspirations: “Assemble a small team of quality people — engineers, physicians, MBAs — who are all willing to wear multiple hats. In a start-up, everyone needs to do everything, from spell-checking brochures to taking out the trash.” 

Kris Newby is the communications manager for Spectrum, the Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Education and Research.  

Stanford University Medical Center integrates research, medical education and patient care at its three institutions – Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital & Clinics and Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital. For more information, please visit the Office of Communication & Public Affairs site at http://mednews.stanford.edu/.

Another biodesign success: Researchers develop low-cost medical ventilators for global disasters